English
Live Chat
TestTrick
10 Best Xobin Alternatives in 2026
Explore the best Xobin alternatives like TestTrick for video interviews, and structured candidate evaluation.
By Tooba Noman
|
Updated on February 26, 2026
Table of Contents
Xobin Alternatives Comparison TableWhat to Look for in a Xobin AlternativeBulk hiring that doesn't break at scaleAnti-cheating that candidates don't hateSkills testing that goes beyond generic questionsVideo interviews built in, not tacked onPricing that gives you flexibility1. TestTrick2. TestGorilla3. Testlify4. HackerRank5. iMocha6. Vervoe7. Codility8. HireVue9. Toggl Hire10. Spark HireFrequently Asked QuestionsConclusion
Xobin is often described as a "talent operating system." It comes with a library of more than 3,500 skills tests and strong AI proctoring tools that monitor things like eye movement and browser activity during assessments. That level of control is a real advantage for teams that care deeply about test security and structured candidate screening.
That said, it won't fit every team's setup. One sticking point for many companies is the pricing model. Xobin requires an upfront annual commitment of $699, which can feel restrictive for startups, smaller businesses, or teams with seasonal hiring cycles.
If you like the idea of solid skills testing but want more flexibility in how you pay and scale, there are good alternatives available. This guide covers 10 Xobin alternatives that offer adaptable pricing and workflows while still giving you the screening strength you need to hire confidently.
If Xobin’s annual pricing and heavy proctoring feel restrictive, several strong alternatives offer more flexibility. Tools like TestTrick and TestGorilla balance skills testing with better candidate experience, while platforms such as HackerRank and HackerEarth go deeper on technical hiring. The right choice depends on your volume, budget, role mix, and how much proctoring your process actually needs.
Xobin Alternatives Comparison Table
| Tool | Best For | Technical & Non-Technical | Video Interviews | Anti-Cheating Approach | Pricing Model | Ease of Setup |
| TestTrick | All-in-one bulk hiring | Yes, supports both | Yes, built-in | Background monitoring, plagiarism detection | Monthly subscription | Fast |
| TestGorilla | Multi-role skills screening | Yes | Yes, but secondary | Webcam snapshots, screen recording | Monthly, custom tiers | Moderate |
| Testlify | Enterprise skills testing | Yes | Yes, AI-powered | AI proctoring and plagiarism detection | Credit-based monthly | Moderate |
| HackerRank | Developer hiring | Technical only | Yes, live coding | Advanced plagiarism detection and AI proctoring | Monthly and enterprise | Moderate |
| iMocha | Enterprise benchmarking | Yes | Limited | AI proctoring | Annual and enterprise | Slower setup |
| Vervoe | Job simulations | Yes | Yes | Light integrity checks | Per-candidate pricing | Moderate |
| Codility | Advanced coding evaluation | Technical only | Yes, pair programming | Pattern-based plagiarism detection | Enterprise-focused | Moderate |
| HireVue | High-volume video hiring | Yes | Yes, AI-scored | AI monitoring | Enterprise annual | Complex |
| Toggl Hire | Lightweight testing | Yes | No | Basic safeguards | Per-user monthly | Very fast |
| Spark Hire | Video-first screening | Yes | Yes, core feature | Minimal | Subscription | Very fast |
What to Look for in a Xobin Alternative
Not every assessment platform solves the same problems. Before you compare tools, figure out what you actually need from a Xobin replacement.
Bulk hiring that doesn't break at scale
If you're hiring 50+ people at once, bulk features matter. You need the ability to send assessments to hundreds of candidates with one action, score and rank them automatically, and filter results without clicking through every submission. Look for CSV upload support, shareable assessment links, and automated shortlisting. If the platform makes you invite candidates one by one, it's not built for volume.
Anti-cheating that candidates don't hate
Cheating is real, but intrusive proctoring creates a terrible candidate experience. Webcam monitoring and facial recognition feel excessive for most roles. Better tools find a middle ground. They track suspicious behavior like tab switching or timing anomalies, randomize question order, and flag plagiarism in coding or written responses without being invasive. The goal is to catch actual cheating, not surveil everyone.
Skills testing that goes beyond generic questions
Generic tests don't tell you much. You need assessments that map to actual job requirements. Some platforms have thousands of pre-built tests across industries. Others let you build custom assessments with coding challenges, scenario questions, and timed tasks. The best options give you both. You can use ready-made tests when they fit and customize when you need something specific.
Video interviews built in, not tacked on
Video screening helps evaluate communication style and soft skills. Check whether the platform includes video natively or forces you to use a separate tool. Native integration is cleaner. You set up one assessment combining skills and video, candidates complete everything in one session, and you review from a single dashboard. Duct-taping separate tools together creates friction.
Pricing that gives you flexibility
Xobin's $699 annual fee locks you in regardless of whether you're hiring steadily or in seasonal bursts. Monthly pricing gives you more control. You can scale up during busy periods and down when hiring slows. Just watch for per-candidate fees that spike unpredictably when volume increases.
1. TestTrick
Best for: All-in-one skills assessments and video screening with scalable bulk hiring
If you're looking for something that handles both assessments and video screening without turning the process into a surveillance exercise, TestTrick is built for that balance. You can invite candidates in bulk by uploading a CSV or by sharing a single public link tied to your job post. Once candidate responses come in, the platform scores and ranks them automatically, so you're not buried in manual reviews.
The test library spans both technical and non-technical roles. You can launch a ready-made assessment as it is, tweak it to fit your needs, or create your own from scratch with coding tests, scenario-based questions, written responses, file uploads, and timed exercises. Video interviews are available alongside these assessments, so you can mix formats based on the role instead of being pushed into a rigid structure. You can also evaluate candidates' soft skills with cognitive ability tests, personality tests, SJTs, and more.
To protect integrity, TestTrick runs quiet anti-cheating safeguards in the background. It detects tab switching, unusual timing patterns, randomizes question order, and flags potential plagiarism. There's no need for intrusive webcam monitoring, but you still get visibility if something looks off.
On the review side, everything is centralized. Scores are calculated instantly, candidates are ranked by performance, and hiring managers can leave comments in one shared workspace. ATS integration keeps candidate data synced automatically, which matters for smooth candidate management across your hiring workflow.
Pricing starts at $49 per month for up to 50 candidates with unlimited assessments included. There are no surprise per-candidate charges, and you can scale your plan up or down depending on hiring volume without losing past data. The candidate experience stays clean too, which helps with completion rates.
Key Features:
- Skills assessments across industries
- Video interview questions with flexible placement
- Bulk candidate management via CSV or link sharing
- Automated scoring and ranking
- Background anti-cheating detection (no webcam required)
- Team collaboration tools
- ATS integrations
- Custom test builder
- Monthly pricing with predictable scaling
Pros:
- Combines skills and video without rigid workflows
- Anti-cheating that doesn't feel invasive
- Affordable monthly pricing, no annual lock-in
- Fast setup for bulk campaigns
- Good for diverse hiring needs
- Better candidate experience than heavy proctoring platforms
Cons:
- May feel feature-rich for teams that only hire occasionally and need something very lightweight
- Works best when hiring criteria are clearly defined upfront
Pricing:
- Starter: $49/month for 50 candidates
- Basic: $75/month for 100 candidates
- Business: $99/month for 150 candidates
- Enterprise: Custom pricing
2. TestGorilla
Best for: Broad multi-role assessment coverage
TestGorilla focuses on structured, skills-first screening. It offers 400+ assessments covering technical roles, personality tests, and cognitive abilities. You can combine different assessment tools into custom sequences and automatically rank candidates based on results. The breadth of this assessment library makes it useful for companies hiring across multiple departments.
Proctoring capabilities include webcam snapshots and screen recording, which adds oversight without full-time remote proctoring. Video interview questions are available, but the platform clearly centers on assessment testing as the primary filter.
Just be careful not to overload candidates. Long test sequences can increase drop-off and hurt candidate engagement, so tighter, role-focused screens tend to work best.
Key Features:
- 400+ pre-built assessments
- Custom test sequences
- Video interview support
- Anti-cheating with webcam snapshots
- Candidate reports
- Team collaboration
- ATS integrations
Pros:
- Extensive test library
- Good for multi-department hiring
- Clear scoring and reporting
- Custom branding options
Cons:
- Video features feel secondary
- Can feel test-heavy
- Webcam requirements may deter some candidates
Pricing:
- Starter: $135/month for small teams
- Pro: Custom pricing
3. Testlify
Best for: Structured skills testing with enterprise features
Testlify offers more than 4,500 assessments across 50+ industries, along with AI-powered video and audio interviews. The assessment platform supports bulk candidate management and includes two-way AI interviews, where candidates interact with an AI interviewer. This helps reduce scheduling friction during early-stage candidate screening.
The platform is built with a strong focus on skills verification through skills assessment, making it a practical choice for teams that rely heavily on structured assessments. Its anti-cheating capabilities include AI proctoring and plagiarism detection for coding assessments which help maintain test integrity.
Key Features:
- 4,500+ pre-built assessments
- AI-powered video and audio interviews
- Two-way AI interviewing
- Bulk candidate management
- Anti-cheating with AI proctoring
- Analytics and reporting
Pros:
- Massive test library
- AI interviews eliminate scheduling
- Handles high volumes well
- Good for skills-heavy roles
Cons:
- No transparent pricing
- Overkill for non-skills-based hiring
- AI proctoring may feel intrusive
Pricing:
- Starter: $99/mo for 10 candidate credits
- Basic: $199/mo for 30 credits
- Business: $499/mo for 100 credits
- Premium: $999/mo for 300 credits
4. HackerRank
Best for: Developer and technical hiring
HackerRank focuses on developer hiring, with coding assessments available in more than 40 programming languages. The platform includes real-world tasks, automated scoring, and live coding interviews through its CodePair environment for pair programming sessions. Built-in plagiarism detection reviews code patterns and flags submissions that look suspicious.
Because the platform is built for technical roles, teams hiring across non-technical functions like marketing or operations will likely need an additional assessment tool. Pricing is typically positioned for larger organizations, with custom quotes that often start in the higher annual range.
Key Features:
- Coding tests in 40+ programming languages
- Live coding interviews (CodePair)
- Automated scoring
- Plagiarism detection
- Performance benchmarking
- ATS integrations
Pros:
- Deep technical assessment capabilities
- Strong plagiarism detection
- Good for senior engineer hiring
- Industry benchmarking
Cons:
- Only useful for technical roles
- Enterprise pricing
- No support for non-technical screening
Pricing:
- Starter: $199/mo
- Pro: $449/mo
- Enterprise: Custom pricing
5. iMocha
Best for: Enterprise-level skill benchmarking
iMocha provides a library of more than 2,500 candidate assessments spanning technical, cognitive assessments, and domain skills. One of its strengths is role-based benchmarking, which lets teams compare candidates against industry norms or internal performance data through detailed candidate evaluation. The platform also includes AI-driven proctoring, in-depth analytics, and optional learning tools for talent development. Integrations are built for large environments, with connections to major ATS and HRIS platforms.
Implementation usually takes time. Most teams work directly with iMocha to configure workflows and integrations before going live. Because of that setup effort, the platform tends to suit larger organizations with dedicated HR tech resources rather than smaller teams that need to launch quickly.
Key Features:
- 2,500+ skills assessments
- Role-based benchmarking
- AI-powered proctoring
- Learning management integration
- Enterprise analytics
- White-label options
Pros:
- Extensive benchmarking capabilities
- Good for internal mobility programs
- Comprehensive analytics
- Enterprise integrations
Cons:
- Expensive enterprise pricing
- Long implementation timeline
- Requires dedicated admin
- Overkill for small teams
Pricing:
- Free Trial: 10 test attempts, 3 ready tests, 2 users
- Basic: $999/yr with 100 test attempts
- Pro: $3,199/yr with 300 test attempts
- Enterprise: Custom
6. Vervoe
Best for: Job simulation-based hiring
Vervoe uses a mix of work samples and job simulations to see how candidates would actually perform. Depending on the role, that might mean drafting content, working through mock support tickets, or prioritizing a messy task list. It's a good way to catch the gap between what someone knows in theory and what they can actually execute through real-world tasks.
The trade-off is speed and effort. Good simulations don't set themselves up. You'll need to define realistic scenarios, add context, and decide how candidate responses should be scored. While the platform helps automate part of the grading, most teams still review submissions manually for nuance. That can slow things down if you're doing high-volume hiring.
Key Features:
- Job simulation candidate assessments
- Custom scenario builder
- AI-assisted scoring
- Work sample evaluation
- Video and written responses
Pros:
- Tests actual job performance
- Catches practical skill gaps
- Good for creative and strategic roles
- Reduces resume bias
Cons:
- Time-intensive setup
- Manual review limits scalability
- Per-candidate pricing gets expensive
- Not ideal for high-volume remote hiring
Pricing:
- $300 for 10 candidates
- $600 for 50 candidates
- $9,000 for 1,000 candidates
7. Codility
Best for: Advanced coding evaluations
Codility is built for teams that want a closer look at how developers actually write and think through code. It supports a wide range of programming languages and goes beyond basic pass or fail scoring through candidate assessment. The platform reviews solution quality, efficiency, and problem-solving approach, then surfaces that data in detailed candidate reports.
One of Codility's stronger points is its plagiarism detection. Instead of only flagging obvious copy-paste behavior, it analyzes coding patterns to catch more subtle similarities between submissions. That helps teams protect test integrity, especially in remote hiring.
Key Features:
- Advanced coding assessments
- Sophisticated plagiarism detection
- Code quality analysis
- Remote pair programming
- Take-home projects
- Performance benchmarking
Pros:
- Deep code quality analysis
- Advanced plagiarism detection
- Good for senior engineers
- Real-world problem sets
Cons:
- Only for technical roles
- Enterprise pricing
- No non-technical screening
Pricing:
- Starter: $1200/annually
- Scale: $600/monthly
8. HireVue
Best for: Enterprise video interviewing with AI scoring
HireVue is built for teams that rely heavily on structured live video interviews. Instead of manually reviewing every response, the platform uses AI tools to analyze how candidates answer questions and helps surface patterns that might indicate role fit. That added layer of structure can speed up early screening for high-volume hiring.
Where HireVue tends to shine is standardized hiring. If you are filling the same role repeatedly across locations, the consistency it brings can be useful. The candidate experience is more structured than conversational, which works for some hiring managers but may feel impersonal to candidates.
Key Features:
- AI-powered video interview scoring
- One-way and live video interviews
- Automated scheduling
- Analytics on hiring funnel
- ATS integrations
- Mobile app
Pros:
- Handles high-volume screening
- AI speeds initial review
- Strong analytics
- Works for standardized roles
Cons:
- Expensive enterprise pricing
- AI scoring raises bias concerns
- Impersonal candidate experience
- Complex setup
Pricing:
- Custom pricing, typically $10,000+ annually
9. Toggl Hire
Best for: Lightweight skills testing for small teams
Toggl Hire keeps things simple with straightforward skills tests and minimal setup. You choose from their test library or build custom candidate assessments using multiple-choice, coding challenges, or open-ended questions. No video interviews, no advanced proctoring tools, no workflow complexity.
Setup takes minutes and you can start screening the same day. The platform works well for occasional hiring in small batches. The trade-off is limited scalability. There's no bulk candidate management or sophisticated candidate scoring systems for high-volume hiring.
Key Features:
- Pre-built test library
- Custom test builder
- Automated scoring
- Team collaboration
- Basic ATS integrations
Pros:
- Simple, fast setup
- Clean interface
- Good for occasional hiring
- Affordable for small teams
Cons:
- Limited bulk hiring features
- No video interviews
- Basic analytics
- Not built for scale
Pricing:
- Free: $0, up to 5 users, basic productivity insights
- Starter: $10 per user per month, includes billable rates and team reports
- Premium: $20 per user per month, adds profitability analysis and advanced reporting
- Enterprise: Custom pricing with dedicated support and tailored setup
10. Spark Hire
Best for: Simple video-first screening
Spark Hire focuses on asynchronous video interviews without skills testing. Candidates record responses to your questions, and hiring managers review on their own time. Multiple reviewers can watch, comment, and rate candidates without scheduling meetings. Playback speed controls help move through large volumes.
The platform doesn't include skills assessments, coding tests, or automated scoring. It works best when hiring managers already know what questions reveal fit and just need a faster way to ask them at scale. No skills testing component means you'll need another tool if technical candidate evaluation matters.
Key Features:
- One-way and live video interviews
- Team collaboration with ratings
- Playback speed controls
- Interview libraries
- Mobile-friendly
- ATS integrations
Pros:
- Easy setup
- Good team collaboration
- Clean candidate experience
- Works as phone screen replacement
Cons:
- No skills assessments
- Limited analytics
- Not useful for technical screening
- Video features may cost extra
Pricing:
- Starts around $299/month
Frequently Asked Questions
Why should hiring managers switch from Xobin?
Teams leave Xobin for a few reasons. The AI proctoring feels too invasive for most roles, making good candidates uncomfortable and hurting the overall candidate experience. The $699 annual commitment doesn't work for companies with seasonal hiring or fluctuating volume. Others find the workflow automation useful but need better skills testing or native video interview integration. Some just want monthly pricing flexibility instead of being locked in for a year.
Which alternative is better for bulk hiring?
TestTrick and TestGorilla both handle volume well. TestTrick combines skills testing and video screening with bulk invite features, automated shortlisting, and monthly pricing. For pure technical hiring at scale, HackerRank or Codility work better. The choice depends on the features you need and how diverse your hiring needs are.
Do Xobin alternatives offer AI proctoring tools?
Some do, some don't. Testlify and iMocha include AI proctoring similar to Xobin's. TestGorilla uses webcam snapshots. TestTrick, Toggl Hire, and Spark Hire skip intensive proctoring in favor of background security checks like tab monitoring and timing analysis. If you need maximum security for high-stakes roles, the proctoring-heavy platforms make sense. For most hiring, lighter anti-cheating features work fine without deterring candidates.
What's the best tool for remote technical hiring?
HackerRank and Codility are built for remote developer screening across multiple programming languages. TestTrick works if you need technical and non-technical screening plus video interviews in one candidate assessment platform. The choice depends on whether you only hire technical roles or need one tool for mixed hiring.
Conclusion
Xobin still works well for teams that need tight test security and a highly controlled screening environment. For the right use case, especially compliance-heavy or high-stakes hiring, it can absolutely do the job.
That said, many teams today are looking for a bit more flexibility, both in pricing and in how they screen candidates. Monthly billing, less invasive anti-cheating features, and built-in video interviews are becoming harder to ignore, especially for fast-moving hiring teams.
If that sounds familiar, it may be worth exploring tools built for that kind of workflow. Platforms that combine skills testing with video screening and bulk handling tend to reduce a lot of the day-to-day friction.
One option to look at is TestTrick. It brings skills assessments, video interviews, and bulk screening into one platform with predictable monthly pricing, so scaling your hiring process feels more controlled.
You can start a free TestTrick trial and run a real hiring campaign through it to see how it fits your process.
Contact Us
FlyPearls LLC. 8 The Green # 4367 Dover, DE 19901 United States
+1 302 261 5361