WeCP (We Create Problems) is a technical assessment platform built to evaluate developers through structured coding tests and remote proctoring. It's been around since 2016 and has a solid reputation for keeping exam integrity tight during online evaluations. Many HR teams use it specifically to verify coding ability before candidates ever reach a phone screen interview.
That said, it's not a perfect fit for every team. Some find the pricing hard to justify. Others need broader assessment tools that go beyond developer hiring. And some want a better candidate experience, smoother ATS integrations, or more control over how proctoring works.
This guide covers the six best WeCP alternatives in 2026, what each one does well, where each one falls short, and which type of team each one is actually built for.
TL;DR: The best overall WeCP alternative for most teams is TestTrick. It covers technical and non-technical hiring in one place, with coding assessments, psychometric tests, video interviews, and AI proctoring starting at $49/month. For pure developer hiring, HackerRank and Codility are equally strong picks.
At a Glance: WeCP Alternatives Compared
| Platform | Best For | Coding Tests | Video Interviews | Psychometric Tests | Remote Proctoring | Starting Price |
|---|
| TestTrick | Technical + non-technical hiring | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | $49/month |
| Codility | Deep engineering screening | Yes | No | No | Yes | $1,200/year |
| CodeSignal | Standardized scoring at scale | Yes | Yes(AI) | No | Yes | Custom |
| HackerRank | Developer pipelines | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | $199/month |
| HackerEarth | End-to-end technical recruiting | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | $99/month |
| CoderPad | Live pair programming interviews | Yes | No | No | Limited | $80/month |
- TestTrick: A skills assessment platform covering technical and non-technical hiring, with built-in video interviews and automated candidate shortlisting.
- Codility: A developer-focused platform known for code quality analysis and strong plagiarism detection.
- CodeSignal: A technical hiring platform built around standardized coding scores and an AI Interviewer.
- HackerRank: A widely used developer assessment platform with a large coding library and live interview tools.
- HackerEarth: A recruiting platform that pairs coding assessments with developer community engagement.
- CoderPad: A live coding interview environment focused on real-time technical evaluation and pair programming.
1. TestTrick
Best for: Teams hiring across both technical and non-technical roles
Summary: TestTrick is a WeCP alternative that combines coding assessments, cognitive assessments, psychometric tests, and video interviews in a single tool, at a price that works for small and mid-sized teams.
TestTrick is built for teams tired of stitching together separate tools. It combines coding assessments, cognitive assessments, psychometric tests, and async video interviews under one roof. You can run a developer screen and a customer service evaluation on the same platform, same day, without switching tabs or logging into anything else. Coding and technical assessments
The coding environment supports hands-on challenges in 12+ programming languages, including Python, JavaScript, Java, and SQL. Reviewers can replay a candidate's code step by step to understand how they worked through the problem, not just whether they arrived at the right answer. There's also a live HTML and CSS simulation for front-end roles.
For roles that require job simulations or real-world tasks, the platform supports scenario-based questions that mirror actual job tasks. That's useful when you want to assess applied thinking.
Beyond technical roles
TestTrick's assessment library includes 400+ pre-built tests across 30+ skill areas. Psychometric tests, situational judgment tests, OCEAN personality tests, and role-specific evaluations for sales, finance, and marketing are all available. You can also build custom assessments if the defaults don't match your job requirements.
Video interviews are a native feature, not a bolt-on. Recruiters send async questions, review recordings from a shared dashboard, and score responses manually or through automated candidate ranking.
Proctoring and assessment integrity
TestTrick's proctoring tools include session screenshots, activity logs, webcam monitoring, screen recording, and lockdown mode. The platform tracks tab switching behavior to flag candidates who leave the test window. Candidate authentication at the start of each session confirms identity before the assessment begins. Remote proctoring can be fully enabled for high-stakes roles. For positions where a lighter setup makes more sense, you can scale it back without losing the core audit trail.
Candidate management and integrations
ATS integrations connect TestTrick to tools like Greenhouse, Lever, and Workday, so candidate data flows into your existing workflow automatically. The centralized review panel lets hiring managers compare candidate performance side by side without jumping between systems. For teams running pre-employment testing across multiple departments, this kind of organized candidate management cuts down on a lot of manual work. Key Features
- 400+ pre-built assessments across 30+ skill areas
- Hands-on coding tests in 12+ programming languages
- Code playback for reviewing candidate problem-solving step by step
- Live HTML and CSS simulation for front-end roles
- Job simulations and real-world tasks for applied skill testing
- Cognitive assessments, psychometric tests, and OCEAN personality tests
- Async video interviews with manual or automated scoring
- Custom test builder for role-specific assessments
- ATS integrations with Greenhouse, Lever, and Workday
- Remote proctoring with tab switching detection and candidate authentication
- Centralized candidate management with side-by-side comparison panel
Pros
- Handles technical and non-technical hiring in one platform
- Code replay gives real visibility into candidate performance
- Proctoring tools are adjustable based on role and sensitivity level
- Built-in video interviews reduce scheduling friction
- Clean candidate experience with a straightforward interface
- Bulk candidate screening across multiple departments in one workflow
Cons
- Feature depth may feel like overkill for very low-volume teams
- Custom test setup requires upfront planning
- Works best when evaluation criteria is defined upfront
Pricing
- Starter: $49/month for up to 50 candidates
- Basic: $75/month for up to 100 candidates
- Business: $99/month for up to 150 candidates
- Enterprise: Custom pricing available
Bottom line: If you're hiring across more than one department and don't want to pay for multiple tools, TestTrick is the most practical choice on this list.
2. Codility
Best for: Deep technical screening for software engineering roles
Summary: Codility is purpose-built for engineering hiring. It produces better signal on developer ability than most platforms, but it doesn't cover anything outside of technical roles.
Codility centers on hands-on coding challenges that test real problem-solving ability rather than surface-level knowledge. For teams running high-volume developer pipelines, the depth of signal it produces is hard to match.
Hiring managers can review code step by step, track how a solution developed over time, and benchmark candidate performance across submissions. That visibility makes it easier to distinguish someone who genuinely understood the problem from someone who patched together a working answer.
Remote pair programming sessions let interviewers watch candidates write and debug code in real time inside a shared integrated development environment (IDE). For structured engineering pipelines, this can replace the early live interview stage entirely.
The main limitation is scope. Codility doesn't offer much outside software roles. There are no psychometric tests, no skills-based assessments for non-technical functions, and no video interview tools. If your candidate pipelines include marketing, operations, or customer service roles, you'll need a separate platform. Pricing also sits at the enterprise level, which is a barrier for smaller teams.
Key Features
- Hands-on coding challenges across multiple programming languages
- Real-time pair programming inside a shared IDE
- Detailed code playback and candidate performance reports
- Advanced plagiarism and similarity detection for exam integrity
- Take-home technical challenges
- Candidate scoring and benchmarking
Pros
- Strong signal for developer evaluation
- Deep visibility into coding approach and problem-solving
- Well-suited for structured technical hiring teams
- Reliable plagiarism detection
Cons
- Built almost entirely for software roles
- No support for non-technical candidate screening
- Pricing geared toward larger organizations
- Requires setup time to align coding tests to your tech stack
Pricing
- Starter: $1,200 annually
- Scale: $600/month
- Enterprise: Custom pricing
Bottom line: Codility is a strong pick for engineering-first companies that hire developers regularly and can justify enterprise pricing. It's not the right fit if you need anything beyond technical assessment.
3. CodeSignal
Best for: Standardized technical screening with an AI Interviewer
Summary: CodeSignal is the best option for teams that need consistent, comparable scores across large volumes of technical candidates. The AI Interviewer feature makes it stand out from most competitors.
CodeSignal runs timed coding assessments and scores candidates against a common benchmark. Engineering teams that want repeatable candidate evaluations across large applicant pools tend to like this approach. It removes subjectivity from manual technical reviews.
The platform supports certified assessments, live technical interviews, and conversational AI interviews where the AI Interviewer adapts follow-up questions based on how a candidate responds. That structured adaptability speeds up candidate screening without requiring a human to review every submission.
The standardized scoring model works especially well for larger organizations and university recruiting programs running high-volume candidate pipelines. Everyone is measured against the same scale, which makes candidate evaluations straightforward.
Where CodeSignal is less flexible is in breadth. It's designed around well-defined technical roles. Teams with mixed hiring needs, or those that want skills assessment tools beyond coding, will likely need a second platform.
Key Features
- Timed coding assessments with standardized candidate scoring
- AI Interviewer with adaptive conversational AI interviews
- Live technical interview environment
- Certified assessment framework
- Skills benchmarking and deep analytics
- Integrations with major Applicant Tracking System platforms
Pros
- Consistent scoring simplifies candidate evaluations at scale
- Strong fit for structured technical hiring teams
- AI Interviewer reduces manual screening effort
- Supports take-home and live tech interviews
- Recognized across larger engineering organizations
Cons
- Limited support for non-technical hiring
- Can feel rigid for fast-moving or smaller teams
- Typically enterprise-level pricing
- Less useful outside of software engineering roles
Pricing
- Custom pricing, quote-based
Bottom line: CodeSignal suits large engineering teams and university recruiting programs that need standardized scoring across many candidates. It's overkill for smaller teams or mixed-role hiring.
4. HackerRank
Best for: Developer assessment with large question libraries and live coding interviews
Summary: HackerRank is one of the most established developer assessment platforms available. It's a solid choice for engineering-focused teams, though the attempt-based pricing can get expensive at volume.
HackerRank combines take-home coding tests, live pair programming sessions, and a question library ranging from 2,000 to 7,500+ coding challenges, depending on the plan. For teams that want to filter candidates through automated screening before a live interview, the setup is practical and well-established.
The platform includes AI-assisted proctoring tools, identity verification, and scorecard assistance to help standardize candidate evaluations and reduce manual review time. Plagiarism detection and leaked question protection help maintain assessment integrity across remote hiring. These proctoring measures have matured over the years and hold up well for large-scale remote testing.
HackerRank is clearly designed for developer pipelines first. If your hiring extends to customer service, marketing, operations, or other non-technical roles, you'll need a separate tool. The attempt-based pricing model also adds up quickly when screening volumes increase.
Key Features
- Library of 2,000 to 7,500+ coding challenges depending on plan
- Take-home technical assessments via HackerRank Screen
- Live pair programming in a shared IDE via HackerRank Interview
- Advanced plagiarism detection and leaked question protection
- AI proctoring, facial recognition, and identity verification on higher tiers
- AI-assisted IDE and scorecard support
- ATS integrations on Pro plans and above
Pros
- Strong reputation among technical hiring teams
- Realistic coding environment for live tech interviews
- Good balance of automated screening and live candidate evaluation
- Built-in proctoring measures for remote hiring
- Scales well for engineering-focused pipelines
Cons
- Primarily built for technical roles
- Attempt-based pricing increases cost with volume
- Not well-suited for non-technical candidate screening
- Advanced proctoring features require higher-tier plans
Pricing
- Starter: $199/month, 1 user, 10 attempts/month
- Pro: $449/month, unlimited users, 25 attempts/month
- Enterprise: Custom pricing with expanded limits and integrations
Bottom line: HackerRank is a dependable choice for engineering teams that run structured developer pipelines. Watch the attempt-based pricing if your screening volume varies month to month.
5. HackerEarth
Best for: End-to-end technical recruiting with hackathons and deep coding assessments
Summary: HackerEarth covers more of the developer hiring lifecycle than any other platform on this list. If you want to attract developers through hackathons before they even apply, it's the only tool here that supports that.
HackerEarth runs from attracting candidates through public hackathons all the way through screening, live interviews, and talent development. For teams that want to reach developers before they apply, that breadth is a genuine advantage.
The platform offers AI-powered talent assessments across 1,000+ skills and 40+ programming languages. The assessment library runs to 25,000+ questions on higher tiers, covering everything from basic screening tasks to real-world simulations that mirror actual job tasks. FaceCode, the built-in live coding interview environment, supports pair programming sessions with remote proctoring and AI-driven insights layered on top.
Proctoring features include facial and behavioral analysis to flag suspicious activity, behavioral monitoring throughout the session, and face and noise detection. For teams that need enterprise-grade security around assessment integrity, these proctoring tools go further than most platforms at this price range.
Hackathons and hiring challenges help companies build visibility within HackerEarth's developer community. This makes it a solid choice for campus hiring and employer branding efforts targeting passive candidates.
Key Features
- Talent assessments across 1,000+ skills and 40+ programming languages
- FaceCode live coding interview environment with shared IDE
- Remote proctoring with facial recognition, behavioral monitoring, and face and noise detection
- Assessment library with 25,000+ questions on higher tiers
- Hackathon and hiring challenge hosting
- AI Interviewer and AI Screener options
- ATS integrations on Scale plans and above
- Soft skills and psychometric tests
Pros
- Deep coverage for technical candidate screening
- Live coding environment with strong proctoring tools
- Large, varied assessment library
- Hackathons support developer engagement and employer branding
- Covers technical skills and psychometric evaluations
Cons
- Can feel heavy for small teams with simple workflows
- Credit-based pricing requires active usage tracking
- Primarily focused on developer hiring
- Setup takes time for more complex configurations
Pricing
- Growth: $99/month, 10 credits/month
- Scale: $399/month, 25 credits/month
- Enterprise: Custom pricing with expanded limits and services
Bottom line: HackerEarth is the right fit for technical recruiting teams that want to run hackathons, build employer brand within developer communities, and manage the full hiring lifecycle in one place.
6. CoderPad
Best for: Real-time pair programming interviews
Summary: CoderPad does one thing very well: live coding interviews. If your process relies on watching candidates write code in real time, it's the most focused tool for that specific use case.
CoderPad is built around a shared online IDE where interviewers and candidates write and debug code together. You can observe how someone actually thinks through a problem, not just what output they produce. Code playback and structured post-session reports make it easy to revisit candidate performance when multiple stakeholders are involved in the decision.
CoderPad supports take-home coding tests and a ready-made question library alongside the live environment. Teams can send structured assessments before a session and use the live interview to go deeper rather than covering basic screening ground.
Unfortunately, if you need psychometric tests, job simulations, or non-technical candidate screening, you'll need a different tool. Automation is also limited compared to broader assessment platforms.
Key Features
- Shared live-coding IDE with multi-language support
- Take-home coding tests and a custom question builder
- Code playback and detailed candidate performance reports
- Unlimited team members with role-based permissions
- ATS integrations and SSO on higher plans
Pros
- Clear visibility into coding ability in a live setting
- Natural pair-programming interview flow
- Flexible annual test limits
- Clean user experience for technical interviewers
- Good fit for deeper technical evaluation conversations
Cons
- Narrowly focused on developer hiring
- Limited automation for candidate management
- Not suited for non-technical screening
- Annual test quotas require forward planning
Pricing
- Free: 2 tests or interviews/month
- Starter: $80/month billed annually, 60 tests or interviews/year
- Team: $400/month billed annually, 360 tests or interviews/year
- Custom: Tailored pricing with ATS integrations, SSO, and dedicated support
Bottom line: CoderPad is the cleanest tool available for live technical interviews. It's not a full assessment platform, but for teams where live pair programming is the centerpiece of their process, it's hard to beat.
How to Choose the Right WeCP Alternative
The right platform depends on three things: who you're hiring, how often, and what your budget allows.
- If you're hiring across technical and non-technical roles: TestTrick is the only platform here that covers both without requiring a second tool. It's also the most affordable option for small and mid-sized teams.
- If you're only hiring software engineers: Codility or HackerRank give you deeper technical signal. Codility is better for code quality analysis. HackerRank is better for high-volume screening with a large question library.
- If you need standardized scores across hundreds of candidates: CodeSignal's benchmark scoring model is designed for exactly that use case.
- If you want to attract developers through community engagement: HackerEarth is the only platform here that supports hackathons and developer community reach before the application stage.
- If live pair programming is your main interview format: CoderPad is the most focused and polished tool for that specific use case.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best WeCP alternative in 2026?
The best WeCP alternative depends on your hiring needs. For teams that hire across technical and non-technical roles, TestTrick is the strongest all-around option. It combines coding tests, cognitive assessments, psychometric tests, video interviews, and remote proctoring in one platform starting at $49/month. For pure developer hiring at scale, HackerRank and Codility are strong choices for technical depth, though both cost significantly more.
Why do teams switch from WeCP?
Teams typically switch from WeCP for one of a few reasons. Pricing can be opaque and higher than expected. Some teams need assessment tools that cover non-technical roles, not just developers. Others want better ATS integrations, a cleaner candidate experience, or more control over proctoring settings. Some teams also want video interviews built into the same platform rather than managing a separate tool.
Which WeCP alternative is best for bulk developer hiring?
TestTrick and HackerRank both handle high-volume screening well. TestTrick offers more affordable pricing with bulk invite support and combines coding tests with video interviews in one platform. HackerRank provides a large question library and deep technical evaluation, but costs significantly more and uses attempt-based pricing that increases with volume.
Which platforms combine coding assessments with video interviews?
TestTrick is the clearest option for teams that want both in one place. It runs coding assessments and video interviews natively, without requiring separate tools. HackerEarth and CodeSignal also support video-style interviews through their AI Interviewer features. Codility and CoderPad focus exclusively on coding evaluation and don't include built-in video interview tools.
What proctoring features should you look for in an assessment platform?
Strong proctoring tools should include webcam monitoring, screen recording, tab switching detection, candidate authentication at login, and behavioral monitoring throughout the session. More advanced platforms add facial recognition and AI-driven behavioral analysis to flag suspicious activity. The right level of proctoring depends on how sensitive the role is and how much friction you're comfortable adding to the candidate experience. Most platforms let you configure proctoring controls by test, so you don't have to apply the same level of oversight across every assessment.
Is WeCP good for non-technical hiring?
No. WeCP is built primarily for technical assessment and developer evaluation. It doesn't offer meaningful tools for psychometric tests, situational judgment tests, or role-specific assessments for non-technical functions like sales, marketing, or customer service.
How does TestTrick compare to WeCP?
TestTrick and WeCP are both technical assessment platforms, but they differ in scope. WeCP focuses on developer evaluation and remote proctoring for technical roles. TestTrick covers a broader range of assessment types, including coding assessments, cognitive assessments, psychometric tests, and video interviews, making it more versatile for teams hiring across multiple departments. TestTrick also offers more transparent pricing starting at $49/month, compared to WeCP's enterprise-oriented pricing model.
Conclusion
WeCP covers the basics for technical screening, but it's not the right fit for every team. The best alternative depends on what roles you're hiring for, the frequency of your hiring cycles, and your budget.
For most teams doing mixed hiring or periodic technical screening, TestTrick hits the right balance of depth, flexibility, and cost. You get coding tests, cognitive assessments, psychometric tests, video interviews, and configurable proctoring features for under $100/month. It's one of the few skills assessment platforms that handles both technical and non-technical hiring without forcing you into a second tool.