English
Live Chat
TestTrick
Top 10 TestGorilla Competitors - 2026
Compare the best TestGorilla alternatives in 2026. See pricing, features, non-technical assessments, and how TestTrick compares for skills-based hiring.
By Tooba Noman
|
Updated on January 29, 2026
Teams don’t start searching for TestGorilla competitors without a reason. For many recruiters, the question isn’t whether TestGorilla works; it is whether the pricing, limits, and control make sense for their hiring volume in 2026.
TestGorilla has built a name with prebuilt tests, ATS integrations, and a broad assessment library. However, when teams look closer at TestGorilla Pricing, limits around test customization, branding, and per-user costs often become sticking points, especially for skills-based hiring at scale.
That is why many teams start comparing options that offer clearer pricing, better candidate experience, stronger anti-cheating controls, and support for both coding and non-technical roles.
The best TestGorilla alternatives in 2026 include TestTrick, Vervoe, TestDome, Xobin, and Testlify. These assessment tools suit recruiters and HR teams needing pricing transparency, structured candidate screening, anti-cheating measures, and support for coding skills, personality tests, and non-technical assessments.
1. TestTrick
TestTrick is a skills assessment platform built for recruiters who want structured evaluations, predictable pricing, and control over how candidates are screened. Instead of charging per user, it offers a simple monthly plan that covers up to 100 candidates, which is plenty for most small to mid-sized hiring cycles.
Best for
Recruiters and hiring managers running skills-based hiring across both technical and non-technical roles.
What it Does Well
- Structured assessments, not guesswork: TestTrick focuses on clear test logic, consistent scoring, and recruiter-led workflows instead of black-box scoring.
- Depth across roles: Supports coding skills, software skill tests, cognitive reasoning, psychometric profiling, situational judgement tests, and soft skills evaluation from one assessment library.
- Practical hiring workflows: Bulk invites, white labelling, candidate scoring, candidate ranking, and candidate report cards fit directly into real screening interviews and shortlisting.
Where it may not fit
- Teams looking for automated or predictive index–style decisioning without recruiter involvement
- Companies that only hire occasionally and prefer per-candidate packs instead of monthly plans
Best Fit Teams
- Small to mid-sized companies
- Recruitment agencies
- HR teams hiring at volume for customer support, sales, marketing, finance, or developer roles
Why Teams Choose TestTrick over TestGorilla
Teams often move to TestTrick when they want more control over the assessment process, clearer candidate analytics, and predictable pricing instead of per-user costs. For example, in customer support or sales hiring, recruiters can combine behavioral assessment, video interviews, and role-specific tests without switching tools.
2. Vervoe
Vervoe is an AI-powered platform focused on soft skills and performance testing. It offers drag-and-drop test builders, automatic scoring, and predictive analytics for real task performance.
Best for
Hiring teams that prioritise behavioral assessment, situational judgement tests, and task responses over traditional test formats.
What it Does Well
- Task-focused assessments: Vervoe leans toward realistic job simulation for roles such as customer service, sales, and operations, rather than question-heavy exams.
- Soft skills and behavior signals: Strong support for soft skills evaluation, culture fit, and workplace judgment using situational judgment tests and written responses.
- Automated candidate ranking: Uses automated scoring to surface higher-performing candidates within the assessment process, reducing manual review time.
Where it May Not Fit
- Usage-based pricing means that costs can increase quickly if you’re testing many candidates.
- Limited depth for technical skills assessments, coding skills, or advanced programming languages
Best Fit Teams
- HR teams hiring for non-technical roles
- Companies with moderate hiring volumes
- Teams comfortable with automated candidate scoring and less recruiter-led control
Quick Comparison vs TestTrick
Compared to TestTrick, Vervoe focuses more on assessment breadth for soft skills and behavioral assessment, while TestTrick offers deeper assessment libraries, clearer scoring control, and stronger support for coding environment, technical skills assessments, and mixed-role hiring workflows.
3. TestDome
TestDome is another of the TestGorilla alternatives that offer pay-per-candidate testing with a focus on deep technical skills assessments for planned hiring.
Best for
Engineering, finance, and accounting teams running structured pre-employment testing for technical roles.
What it Does Well
- Strong technical focus: TestDome is built around technical skills assessments, coding skills, and software skill tests for developers and finance professionals.
- Code playback visibility: Recruiters can replay how candidates write, edit, and debug code, which helps evaluate candidate skills and problem-solving approach.
- Clear candidate scoring: Assessment reports highlight performance at a question and skill level, supporting technical candidate screening.
Where it May Not Fit
- Limited test customization and no branding for candidate experience
- Not designed for soft skills evaluation, personality tests, or mixed-role hiring
Best Fit Teams
- Tech teams hiring developers in defined batches
- Companies with predictable hiring cycles and bulk assessment needs
Quick Comparison vs TestTrick
Compared to TestTrick, TestDome offers a deeper focus on pure coding skills but less flexibility and customization across behavioral assessment, video interviews, and non-technical candidate assessment workflows.
4. Xobin
Xobin is a multi-role assessment platform combining psychometric tests, video interviews, and role-based screening.
Best for
HR teams hiring across technical and non-technical roles who want branded assessments and varied test formats.
What it Does Well
- Broad assessment library: Xobin supports psychometric tests, cognitive ability tests, situational judgement tests, and software skill tests from a large content library.
- Video and behavioral screening: One-way video interviews add context for communication skills, attitude, and culture fit.
- Brand control: White-labeled assessments and branded candidate dashboards support a consistent candidate experience.
Where it May Not Fit
- Less depth in advanced coding environments and programming languages compared to developer-focused platforms
- Assessment breadth may require extra setup to maintain consistent candidate scoring
Best Fit Teams
- Mid-size companies hiring across departments
- HR teams managing candidate screening for sales, marketing, operations, and entry-level tech roles
Quick Comparison vs TestTrick
Compared to TestTrick, Xobin focuses more on assessment breadth and branding, while TestTrick places stronger emphasis on structured assessments, predictable scoring, and recruiter-led assessment processes across roles.
5. Testlify
Testlify is a pay-as-you-go assessment tool built for small teams that hire occasionally and want quick candidate screening.
Best for
Startups and small businesses running low-volume pre-employment testing without long-term commitments.
What it Does Well
- Simple assessment setup: Testlify supports aptitude tests, coding skills, behavioral assessment, and basic psychometric tests without a long setup process.
- Budget control: Candidate packs (such as 10 candidates per plan) help teams manage assessment costs without monthly usage pressure.
- Basic screening coverage: Includes plagiarism detection, time controls, and simple assessment reports for pass/fail decisions.
Where it May Not Fit
- Limited test customization and assessment builder flexibility
- Minimal ATS integrations and candidate analytics for ongoing hiring
Best Fit Teams
- Early-stage startups
- Small HR teams with occasional hiring needs
- Companies running short screening interviews before live interviews
Quick Comparison vs TestTrick
Compared to TestTrick, Testlify works better for short-term hiring bursts, while TestTrick is designed for continuous candidate screening with deeper assessment libraries, structured candidate scoring, and recruiter-led workflows.
6. iMocha
iMocha is an enterprise-focused skills assessment and talent intelligence platform designed for large organizations running high-volume, skills-first hiring across technical and non-technical roles.
Best for
Large enterprises and global HR teams managing structured, skills-based hiring at scale with internal skill taxonomy and workforce planning needs.
What it Does Well
- Extensive skills library: iMocha offers a large catalog of skill tests covering IT, digital, finance, and role-based assessments aligned with enterprise hiring needs.
- Enterprise-grade skills intelligence: It goes beyond screening with skill benchmarking, internal skill mapping, and workforce capability insights for long-term talent planning.
- Strong compliance and integrations: Built for enterprise environments with SSO, role-based access, audit logs, and integrations with major ATS and HRIS platforms.
- Remote proctoring controls: Includes webcam monitoring, screen recording, question randomization, and plagiarism checks to maintain assessment integrity at scale.
Where it May Not Fit
- Pricing and setup are typically enterprise-oriented
- Less emphasis on lightweight, interview-adjacent workflows such as rapid shortlisting or simple monthly hiring cycles.
Best Fit Teams
- Large enterprises and multinational companies
- HR teams hiring at high volume across multiple departments
- Organizations focused on long-term skills intelligence and workforce planning
Quick Comparison vs TestTrick
Compared to TestTrick, iMocha is optimized for enterprise-scale skills intelligence and workforce analytics, while TestTrick focuses on recruiter-controlled assessments, predictable pricing, and practical screening workflows. Teams that want fast setup, clear scoring logic, and structured candidate evaluation for ongoing hiring often prefer TestTrick, whereas iMocha suits organizations with complex enterprise hiring and internal skill frameworks.
7. HireVue
HireVue is a hiring platform best known for video interviewing and structured interview assessments, widely used by enterprise organizations to standardize early-stage candidate screening at scale.
Best for
Large organizations and enterprise HR teams running high-volume hiring that rely on video interviews, structured interview frameworks, and standardized candidate evaluation.
What it Does Well
- Asynchronous video interviewing: HireVue enables one-way video interviews where candidates respond to pre-recorded questions, helping teams screen large applicant volumes efficiently.
- Structured interview workflows: Built around consistent interview questions and scoring rubrics to improve fairness and comparability during early-stage screening.
- Enterprise compliance and integrations: Supports large-scale deployments with ATS integrations, enterprise security controls, and global compliance requirements.
- Assessment add-ons: Offers game-based assessments and structured evaluations that complement video interviews for early screening.
Where it May Not Fit
- Less flexibility for recruiter-led assessment design, customization, or mixed assessment workflows combining technical and non-technical tests.
- Pricing and setup are typically enterprise-focused, which may be restrictive for small or mid-sized hiring teams.
Best Fit Teams
- Enterprises hiring at scale for graduate programs, customer-facing roles, and early-career positions
- HR teams prioritizing video interviewing over deep skills testing
- Organizations focused on interview standardization and compliance-driven hiring processes
Quick Comparison vs TestTrick
Compared to TestTrick, HireVue centers on video interviewing and interview consistency, while TestTrick focuses on skills-based hiring through structured assessments, coding tests, psychometric evaluation, and recruiter-controlled scoring.
8. Criteria Corp
Criteria Corp is a pre-employment assessment platform focused on psychometric testing, cognitive ability assessments, and personality tests to help employers predict job performance and reduce hiring bias.
Best for
HR teams and recruiters who prioritize validated psychometric assessments and data-backed candidate evaluation over task-based or hands-on skills testing.
What it Does Well
- Strong psychometric assessments: Criteria Corp is known for its scientifically validated cognitive aptitude tests, personality assessments, and behavioral evaluations used across many industries.
- Bias-reduction focused hiring: Standardized assessments help create consistency in candidate screening and support fairer hiring decisions beyond resumes.
- Job success indicators: Reports emphasize predictors such as problem-solving ability, learning agility, workplace behavior, and cultural alignment.
- ATS integrations: Integrates with popular applicant tracking systems to streamline candidate assessment within existing hiring workflows.
Where it May Not Fit
- Limited support for hands-on skills assessments, such as coding tests, technical simulations, or role-specific task execution.
- Not designed for mixed-role hiring workflows that combine technical, non-technical, and practical skill validation in one platform.
- Less flexibility for recruiters who want custom assessment logic or recruiter-led scoring control.
Best Fit Teams
- HR teams focused on cognitive ability testing and personality assessment
- Organizations hiring for leadership, professional, and non-technical roles
- Companies prioritizing standardized, research-backed pre-employment testing
Quick Comparison vs TestTrick
Criteria Corp focuses on psychometric and cognitive assessment depth, while TestTrick supports broader skills-based hiring with coding tests, role-specific assessments, situational judgement tests, video interviews, and structured recruiter-led workflows. For practical skill validation alongside behavioral and cognitive evaluation, choose TestTrick.
9. Bryq
Bryq is a psychometric assessment and candidate screening platform designed to help hiring teams evaluate cognitive ability, personality traits, and job fit early in the recruitment process. The platform focuses on data-driven, skills-based hiring by combining cognitive assessments and behavioral profiling to predict on-the-job performance and long-term role fit.
Best for
HR teams and recruiters who want to reduce resume bias and improve hiring decisions using psychometric testing and objective candidate evaluation rather than task-based or technical skills assessments.
What it Does Well
- Cognitive and personality assessments: Bryq measures reasoning ability, problem-solving skills, and personality traits to assess how well candidates match a role’s requirements.
- Bias-reduction in hiring: Standardized psychometric assessments help support fairer, more consistent candidate screening across roles and locations.
- Job fit prediction: Uses role-specific benchmarks to compare candidates against ideal performance profiles, supporting skills-based hiring decisions.
- ATS integrations: Integrates with common applicant tracking systems to fit into existing recruitment workflows.
Where it May Not Fit
- Limited support for hands-on skills assessments, such as coding tests, software simulations, or role-specific task execution.
- Not designed for technical hiring that requires live coding environments or practical skill validation.
- Less flexibility for recruiters who prefer a fully recruiter-led assessment design.
Best Fit Teams
- HR teams hiring for non-technical and professional roles
- Organizations focused on psychometric testing, cognitive ability assessment, and bias reduction
- Companies seeking structured, data-driven pre-employment assessment
Quick Comparison vs TestTrick
Bryq focuses on psychometric assessment and job-fit prediction, while TestTrick supports broader skills-based hiring with coding tests, role-specific assessments, situational judgement tests, video interviews, and structured recruiter-controlled workflows.
10. HackerRank
HackerRank is a technical hiring and skills assessment platform focused on evaluating coding skills, problem-solving ability, and real-world programming performance. It is commonly included in comparisons of TestGorilla alternatives when teams need deeper technical assessments rather than general aptitude or mixed-role testing.
Best for
Engineering teams, technical recruiters, and companies hiring developers who need hands-on coding assessments and realistic programming environments.
What it Does Well
- Advanced coding assessments: HackerRank offers a wide range of coding tests across multiple programming languages, data structures, algorithms, and role-specific technical skills.
- Realistic coding environment: Candidates work in IDE-like environments that closely resemble real development workflows, improving assessment accuracy.
- Strong developer signal: Tests are designed to evaluate how candidates think, debug, and solve problems, not just whether they know theory.
- Interview tools: Includes live coding interviews and collaborative coding sessions for later-stage technical evaluation.
Where it May Not Fit
- Not designed for non-technical roles, soft skills evaluation, or psychometric assessments.
- Less suitable for teams that want one platform to handle both technical and non-technical candidate screening.
- Pricing and setup may be excessive for small teams hiring developers occasionally.
Best Fit Teams
- Engineering-led organizations hiring developers at scale
- Tech companies focused on software engineering, data science, and technical roles
- Recruiters who want strong technical signal before interviews
Quick Comparison vs TestTrick
Compared to TestTrick, HackerRank specializes in deep technical and coding assessments, while TestTrick supports broader skills-based hiring across technical and non-technical roles with structured assessments, psychometric testing, situational judgement tests, video interviews, and recruiter-led scoring workflows. Teams hiring exclusively for developer roles may prefer HackerRank.
Quick Comparison: Top TestGorilla Alternatives (2026)
| Platform | Pricing Model | Role Coverage | Coding Environment | Non-Technical Roles | Anti-Cheating | ATS Integrations | Best Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TestGorilla | Per user / tiered | Broad | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Teams okay with per-user pricing and fixed test formats |
| TestTrick | Flat, Subscription based | Broad | Yes (multiple programming languages) | Yes | Yes (screen recording, plagiarism detection) | Yes | Recruiter-led skills-based hiring at scale or for startup teams |
| Vervoe | Usage-based monthly | Non-technical heavy | No | Yes | Limited | Limited | Soft skills and behavioral assessment focus |
| TestDome | Per candidate (bulk) | Technical | Yes | No | Limited | No | Planned developer and finance hiring |
| Xobin | Pay as you use | Broad | Limited | Yes | Yes | Limited | Branded assessments across departments |
| Testlify | Credit based | Broad | Basic | Yes | Basic | Limited | Small teams with occasional hiring |
| iMocha | Custom pricing | Broad | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Enterprise-scale hiring and skills intelligence |
| HireVue | Custom pricing with addons | Broad (interview-led) | Basic | Yes | Limited | Yes | High-volume hiring using video interviews |
| CriteriaCorp | Per assessment / subscription | Non-technical focused | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Psychometric and cognitive ability screening |
| Bryq | Subscription-based | Non-technical focused | No | Yes | Limited | Yes | Bias reduction and job-fit prediction |
| HackerRank | Subscription / usage-based | Technical | Yes (advanced IDE) | No | Yes | Yes | Developer and technical role hiring |
Key Takeaways
Choosing between TestGorilla alternatives depends on how your assessment process actually works. Teams comparing TestGorilla pricing often want clearer costs, better test customization, stronger candidate screening, or support for both coding skills and non-technical roles.
Some hiring teams lean toward tools focused on psychometric tests and soft skills evaluation, while others need deeper technical skills assessments with a proper coding environment and reliable candidate scoring. For structured, skills-based hiring across roles, platforms like TestTrick focus on assessment depth and recruiter-led workflows. Simpler tools may work for short-term or low-volume hiring.
The right choice is the one that fits your assessment process, hiring volume, and how much control you want over candidate evaluation, not just the feature list.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Is TestGorilla suitable for technical hiring?
TestGorilla supports basic technical skills assessments, but teams hiring developers often compare TestGorilla alternatives that offer deeper coding environments, broader programming languages, code playback, and clearer candidate scoring during pre-employment testing.
2. Which TestGorilla alternative is best for coding tests?
Among TestGorilla alternatives, TestTrick and TestDome are often chosen for coding skills assessments because they support live coding environments, multiple programming languages, plagiarism detection, and detailed candidate assessment reports.
3. Does TestTrick support non-technical roles?
Yes. TestTrick supports non-technical candidate screening through personality tests, behavioral assessment, cognitive ability tests, situational judgement tests, video interviews, and role-specific assessment templates for sales, support, marketing, and finance teams.
4. Are TestGorilla competitors cheaper?
Some TestGorilla competitors offer lower or clearer pricing depending on hiring volume. Tools like TestTrick use flat monthly pricing, while others use per-candidate packs, making cost control easier during ongoing candidate assessment and screening.
5. Can these assessment tools replace interviews?
Assessment tools do not replace interviews but reduce screening interviews. Skills assessment software helps shortlist candidates using structured tests, candidate ranking, and assessment reports before live interviews, saving recruiter time and improving candidate experience.
6. Do TestGorilla alternatives include anti-cheating features?
Yes. Many TestGorilla alternatives include anti-cheating features such as plagiarism detection, screen monitoring, identity verification, AI-based proctoring, time tracking, and question randomization to protect assessment integrity during candidate screening.
7. Are these tools suitable for both recruiters and HR teams?
Yes. These assessment tools are used by recruiters, HR teams, and hiring managers to manage assessment processes, candidate analytics, ATS integrations, and candidate report cards across technical and non-technical hiring workflows.
8. What should teams compare when choosing a TestGorilla alternative?
Teams should compare assessment depth, pricing model, candidate experience, coding environment support, assessment library size, test customization, candidate scoring clarity, and how well the platform fits their overall skills-based hiring process.
Contact Us
FlyPearls LLC. 8 The Green # 4367 Dover, DE 19901 United States
+1 302 261 5361